Question: What Went Wrong With The Hobbit Trilogy?

Why are there three Hobbits?

The REAL Reason The Hobbit Was Made Three Movies.

Warner bros rushed production and added the third film to maximize budgets.

Due to the phenomenal critical and commercial success of Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movies, it seemed like a matter of “when” not “if” an adaptation of The Hobbit would hit theaters..

Did Guillermo del Toro work on The Hobbit?

Guillermo del Toro was hired to direct The Hobbit in 2008, but left after two years of pre-production. … In April 2008, del Toro was hired to direct The Hobbit. By that point, he was already a well-known filmmaker through his directing work in Cronos, Mimic, The Devil’s Backbone, Blade II, and Hellboy.

Why did the hobbit movie fail?

Hobbit lacked the focus of the LOTR movies and tried to correct the issue mid-stride in a way that just didn’t work. … Part of this is due to the fact that those films had so much more information they needed to cover. Lord of the Rings adapted 3 books (one per movie), whereas The Hobbit spread one book over three films.

Was the Hobbit trilogy a success?

The Hobbit trilogy, Jackson’s attempt to catch lightning in a bottle a second time, was less successful. It did just as well at the box office, but the fans who showed up in droves to see the story of one relatively short novel play out in a trio of three-hour epics were left pretty disappointed.

Why does the Hobbit look worse than LOTR?

Assuming you’re referring to the movie it’s because much more CGI was used on the Hobbit than was used on the Lord of the Rings. The software (and hardware) used for the CGI of the Lord of the Rings was limited in how accurate they could make people look on close distances.

Was the hobbit a flop?

Despite critics considering the series inferior to its predecessor The Lord of the Rings, it was successful financially; The Hobbit trilogy is one of the highest-grossing film series of all time. It was nominated for various awards and won several, although not as many as the original trilogy.

Why did The Hobbit look so weird?

You might have heard that The Hobbit looks kind of weird. The movie was shot with a special camera developed by the founder of Oakley sunglasses (weirdly enough), at 48 frames per second (fps). That frame rate seem to make people generally unhappy.

Why does Legolas look different in the Hobbit?

If you mean why does he look different than that is because Orlando Bloom was older than he was filming Lord Of The Rings. … In the Hobbit trilogy he is much darker than in the Lord Of The Rings but he never seems to go through an arc that shows him changing to where he becomes the Legolas he was in Lord of The Rings.

Why did they change the Hobbit so much?

The quick answer is that The Hobbit Trilogy of movies is based on one short book, The Hobbit. So director Peter Jackson had to heavily pad each movie and much of the plot of each one was made up by him. If he had chosen instead to stick to the original book, it could have brought to the screen in one long movie.

What did Guillermo del Toro do in The Hobbit?

Naturally, this could have had a significant effect on The Hobbit. Before Peter Jackson made the decision to return to the director’s chair, del Toro was the man set to helm the J.R.R. Tolkien adaptation and in addition to working on the script he also spent months working on pre-production.

Should I watch LOTR or hobbit first?

For the films, watch Lord of the Rings first, then watching The Hobbit is optional because it’s almost completely unlike the books or the prior three films in tone or content.

What’s Better The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings?

Although both books had challenges and death along the way, The Hobbit was more contained in its stakes, while The Lord of the Rings was much grander. … The Ring of Power also played a much simpler role in The Hobbit. It didn’t make Bilbo evil; it just helped him on his adventure. Its influence had yet to reach its peak.

Why didnt Guillermo del Toro direct The Hobbit?

The real reason Guillermo del Toro didn’t direct the Hobbit trilogy. … Jackson had originally intended to include Tolkien’s prequel novella, The Hobbit, in his original film trilogy, but couldn’t do so due to the rights being tied up.

Is The Hobbit better than Lord of the Rings?

But, more than anything else, the reason The Hobbit is a better read is because it’s more fun to read. The writing itself is written in a lighthearted way where the narrator inserts himself sometimes. Gandalf is fun and enjoys having a good time in The Hobbit, whereas in Lord of the Rings he’s unbearably serious.

How much did Peter Jackson make from Lord of the Rings?

Peter Jackson is most widely recognized for his multi-award winning film adaption of “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy. The Lord of the Rings and Hobbit movies have earned more than $6 billion at the box office and on DVD. Jackson earned $180 million off The Lord of the Rings trilogy.